He seems to compare windows 3.1 with Mac os X. He complains that this is a shot to the Apple’s market share, which is already eroding without this donation, but then he also complains about the quality of the equipment. If he complains about the amount of money available, then why he doesn’t contribute himself to this cause. ![]() Maybe this is the best solution overall, given the amount of money available. He also doesn’t consider or explain how this money is settled for this donation, and why Windows 3.1 and old computers are selected. He seems to know how to best spend money of Microsoft, as if he is the accountant of the company. What he essentially says is that, if MS has lots of money they should have bought better equipment. ![]() You’re telling me a company with forty billion dollars in cash reserves cannot afford to at least extend new PC’s? ![]() Really, the Apple angle is incidental, but the level of equipment MS’s supposedly generous offering would extend is beyond contempt. Here is one funny statement.Ī wonderful offering by Microsoft to donate thousands of ancient PC’s running Windows 3.1 or even (gasp) Windows 95 to schools all across America in a move that would not only seed America’s education system with a plethora of outdated, useless equipment but (coincidentally) take shots at Apple’s market share. The author is one of the authors who enjoy bashing Microsoft, and make money out of it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |